“Why is the tube so hot?” is one of those questions Londoners find themselves asking a lot during the three or four days a year when the city’s weather isn’t wholly bloody miserable. But it’s not something to which I’ve ever given much thought. A lot of people, enclosed space – the reasons are obvious, surely?
Except, not every underground railway in the world has this problem. And once upon a time, London didn’t either: when the Bakerloo line first opened, posters suggested it was a good place to keep cool on a hot day, an idea that’s clearly nonsensical in 2017.
And then, from the Twitter feed of occasional CityMetric contributor @LeftOutside earlier, I learned something genuinely amazing:
Trains have been running *so long* london’s clay tunnels cannot absorb any more heat, hence tube is so hot when 100 years ago it was cold.
— Left Outside (@leftoutside) June 19, 2017
My mind, as the kids say, is blown.
And it’s true. In 1900, according to this fascinating article in Rail magazine, the ambient heat of the earth surrounding the tunnels – clay, mostly – was around 14°C. In the height of summer, the tunnels were indeed colder than the air above, so it made sense to travel by tube to cool down.
The problem is – trains full of people tend to give off heat. According to this article from a 2007 edition of Plant Engineering magazine, the vast majority (89 per cent) of that heat comes from the train itself (the friction during braking is the big one), 7 per cent from passengers and 4 per cent from “Tunnel support systems”.
What happens to this heat? On the sub-surface lines – basically, those which share tracks with the Circle – it’s not too big a problem. The tunnels are close to the surface, so often emerge into the light for brief periods (Barbican, South Kensington and Edgware Road are all above ground). They also have plenty of ventilation shafts. The heat has somewhere to go.
The deep tubes, though – the ones which are literally tunnels bored through the ground – are more problematic. Most of them are old, so were built before anyone realised heat would be a problem, and don’t come with enough ventilation shafts to solve it. The air is trapped. And so, the heat is absorbed by the walls, and the earth behind them.
In 1900, as noted above, the average ambient temperature was 14°C. Some 117 years and millions of trains later, it can be anywhere between 20°C and 25°C.
Let’s just say that again: London has been running tube trains so long that the ground beneath parts of the city is now as much as 10°C hotter than it was in 1900.
One result of this is that the earth has become much less effective at absorbing the excess heat. That means the tunnels themselves have heated up, too. A lot: air inside them can often reach as high as 30°C. You’ve probably noticed this is you’ve been on the tube recently.
For the last decade or so, Transport for London has been looking for solutions to this. Some of them involve increasing the capacity of existing ventilation systems (lack of space above ground means it’s extremely difficult to build new ones). Others involve adding systems which circulate water to cool the air. Yet other options involve things like more efficient braking systems, on the grounds that if you put less heat in, you have less to take out.
It’s clear that there’s no easy solution, however: in 2003, then London mayor Ken Livingstone offered a prize of £100,000 to anyone who could come up with fresh ideas. Nobody could think of anything TfL wasn’t already trying, and the prize went unclaimed.
The upside to this story is that other cities have learned from London’s mistakes, and ensured that ventilation systems are an integral part of new metro systems.
The downside is you’re likely to boil every time you get the Central line in summer for the foreseeable future.This article is from the CityMetric archive: some formatting and images may not be present.