Crossrail. It’ll be great, right? A massive new railway, ferrying people from one side of London to the other in mere nanoseconds? It’s gonna be brilliant, yeah?
Well, yeah, it’ll be alright, probably. I mean it’ll be pretty useful if you’re trying to get from, say, Heathrow Airport to Docklands. Or Reading to the City. Or (this one for the connoisseurs) Romford to Slough.
But what about the station names, eh? What about the awful, awful, station names?
Okay, this might take some explaining. And I’m not going to lie to you: this piece goes on for far longer than you’re expecting it to. So to whet your appetite, here’s a map of what the new Crossrail stations obviously should be called.
Appetite whetted? Ready to go?
Good. Buckle up. It’s going to be a bumpy ride.
Acton Main Line
Let’s start in the west.
Originally named simply Acton, this west London station has been called Acton Main Line since 1949. Unofficially, one suspects, it’s been known as that for even longer: the phrase “main line” has the air of the authorities finally bowing to the inevitable.
The reason the station ended up with this ugly label is presumably that all the other possibilities were taken. Acton is unique in London in that other station names have already hoovered up all four points of the compass. There’s an Acton Central, too, and an Acton Town. Once upon a time there was even an Acton Green, though that’s called Chiswick Park these days.
Anyway. Acton Main Line will be silly, once the station is served only by Crossrail, and Acton Crossrail is just as ugly as the current name. Acton Horn Lane is probably the obvious alternative, but the station is also at one end of Friary Road, and Acton Friary is much prettier. So Acton Friary it is.
The next stop you come to is Paddington, which is basically fine. I mean, it serves Paddington station, doesn’t it? What else would you call it?
Of course, there is an argument that Paddington station is already a bit messed up. The Circle line serves it twice, at two different platforms – you can literally get a tube from one bit of Paddington to another bit of Paddington, should you have an hour to spare – but that’s hardly Crossrail’s fault, is it? So, yes, it’s basically fine.
But then things start getting tricky.
There are a number of problems here. One is that naming stations after streets annoys me, for reasons I’ll come to below.
Another is that there is no London Street called Bond Street. Honestly, there’s a New Bond Street, off Oxford Street, which turns into Old Bond Street if you keep heading south; and there are two stations vaguely near them, only one of which is called Bond Street. And being the sort of OCD weirdo who writes stuff like this, that annoys me.
But the big problem with having a Crossrail station called Bond Street is that the new station will be much bigger than the old. Its eastern ticket hall will be in Hanover Square, which is basically next to Oxford Circus tube. Although it won’t connect with that station, it’ll still mean there’ll be an entrance to Bond Street station next to Oxford Circus and that’s really, really irritating.
The stations on Paris’ RER network, which is one of the models for Crossrail, often connect more than one metro station. Some of them (like Châtelet–Les Halles) combine the names; others (Auber, for example) take an entirely different one.
The latter seems the obvious course, and Hanover is a nice name, so let’s call it that.
Tottenham Court Road
Remember how I said naming stations after streets annoys me? Well, this is why.
A station is a point; a street is a line. By naming the former after the latter you end up with lunacy like Tottenham Court Road, a street 1km long with three stations on it, and where the eponymous tube station is right at one end of the road. There will almost certainly be people who’ve got off the tube at Tottenham Court Road station, convinced that they’re nearly at their destination, only to find they’re the better part of a mile away and they really should have stayed on until Warren Street.
Honestly. It’s a miracle civilisation hasn’t completely broken down, isn’t it?
Anyway. Crossrail seems as good an excuse as any to finally address this madness and rename Tottenham Court Road to something less misleading. St Giles, the archaic name for this area, is the obvious name to go with. Much prettier.
Bond Street Crossrail will come painfully close to connecting two tube stations, and then wuss out to prevent over-crowding. Farringdon Crossrail will actually do it, linking Farringdon in the west with Barbican in the east.
Being able to change trains at Barbican onto a station called Farringdon seems silly, and will look bloody horrible on the map:
So, on the Paris principle, why not call the new station something else? Let’s go with Smithfield, after the neighbouring meat market which sort of sits between the two tube stations.
Same problem as Farringdon, only this one feels slightly worse because the two stations it connects, Liverpool Street and Moorgate, have completely different connecting lines.
The new platforms will sit under the site of the old Broad Street station, which is now the Broadgate office development. So might as well call it that, really. Broadgate it is.
Whitechapel is fine. We have no complaints about Whitechapel.
Although since we’re here it seems a good moment to note the mildly ridiculous fact that, at Whitechapel, the London Underground runs overground, and you have to walk down some stairs to reach the London Overground. Which runs underground.
It’s like they’re doing it deliberately.
Last stop, but this one’s a doozy.
Canary Wharf is already a mess. There’s a DLR station called Canary Wharf; but that’s separate from the tube station which is also called Canary Wharf, and which is actually closer to Heron Quays on the DLR.
The new Crossrail station is going to be where we’ve put that red circle. Which is miles away from both existing stations but quite close to West India Quay and Poplar.
The opening of Crossrail seems like the perfect moment to untangle this mess. And while the people who own the Canary Wharf Estate are probably not going to accept not getting their name on the rather expensive new station they’ve just had built in one of their docks, TfL could at least force them to accept a subheading: the Crossrail station would become Canary Wharf North Quay, the Jubilee one would become Canary Wharf Jubilee Park, and the DLR one in the middle becomes plain old Canada Square.
Otherwise you’ll get people trying to change from Crossrail to the Jubilee line only to find there’s a whole complex of skyscrapers in the way, and just wandering aimlessly around the underground shopping malls in a daze until they’re thrown out by security guards because the whole area is actually a private estate. And then where will be we? Where will it end, eh? Eh? I ask you.
Anyway I’m going for a lie down.
If you’ve read this far, you really might as well follow us on Facebook.
This article is from the CityMetric archive: some formatting and images may not be present.