Sign up for our newsletter
Europe / Germany

Green recovery funds should be channelled straight to cities – report

Supporting cities to take the lead on climate action could help G7 governments deliver a quick and efficient green recovery, but they must offer cities direct funding, say BloombergNEF and C40 Cities

Among G7 countries alone, $267bn (€229.8bn) in stimulus funds could be used immediately to drive a green recovery, but governments should make this funding directly available to cities, says a report from BloombergNEF and not-for-profit C40 Cities.

Signs indicating Ultra Low Emission Zone (ULEZ) on a street in London, UK. (Photo by Alena Kravchenko/iStock)

The report identifies the best measures for advancing a green and just urban recovery, highlighting initiatives successful in cutting emissions that could be “copy and pasted” into hundreds of cities globally.

The largest recipient of stimulus funds is public transport, receiving 33% of the $267bn, due to its enormous potential for decarbonisation and rapid job creation.

One successful transport initiative is Ultra-Low Emission Zones (ULEZs), which introduce a fixed daily charge on heavily polluting vehicles in urban centres such as central London. There, the proportion of heavily polluting vehicles accessing the zone has decreased from 61% in 2017 to 23% in January 2020.

White papers from our partners

However, many national stimulus programmes across the G7 provide for only a small share of funds to go to cities directly.

The report recommends that cities set long-term targets to signal investment opportunities to public and private stakeholders, and also to encourage governments to allocate budgets directly to them.

This article originally appeared on Energy Monitor.

Inside the global clean energy transition.