So here’s a spurious thing someone sent me a link to the other day: a poster from Place in Print, which shows all of London’s boroughs, to scale, in alphabetical order. I never knew I wanted such a thing, and yet:
What it reminds me of is one of those diagrams of what human chromosomes actually look like: suddenly you can see that they’re all funny shapes and some are radically different sizes to others.
Anyway, I am incapable of looking at such a thing without writing a silly listicle of my thoughts on the topic in the hope of viral traffic – you clicked, didn’t you? You’re in no position to judge here – and so, here goes.
Seriously, the size differential is crazy
The largest borough is Bromley, at 150km2. The smallest is Kensington & Chelsea, at 12km2. In other words, the largest borough is 12.5 times the size of the smallest.
That’s a big gap. By way of contrast, in New York, the ratio between the smallest borough (Manhattan) and the largest (Queens) is a relatively sensible five. In Paris the ratio between the largest (15th) and smallest (2nd) arondissements is about 8.5 (so long as you exclude the Bois de Vincennes and Bois de Boulogne, but let’s not get into that here).
Anyway: the point is you could fit 12 Kensington & Chelseas into Bromley and still have land to spare. Incidentally, there are 325,000 people in Bromley, and about half that, 158,000, in Kensington & Chelsea. That means that the latter is six times more densely populated than the former.
We should really be talking about building more houses in Bromley, is what I’m getting at.
And that’s without even thinking about the City
Aw, look at the dinky little thing:
Southwark is basically the same shape as Lambeth, only upside down and melting
Some of the boroughs are sensibly square
Or at least, polygonal:
But Kingston looks like a wooden leg
That’s my story and I’m sticking to it.
Some of them have really stupid boundaries…
Look at Hounslow:
It’s 16km long but, at its narrowest point, less than 1km wide. Like I said: stupid.
…for which you can sometimes blame the river
Barking can’t even blame that
What the hell is this pointy bit up the top for? Couldn’t they put Chadwell Heath in Redbridge or Havering instead?
Talking of which:
Redbridge is clearly a saddle
Havering looks like Hackney’s dad
“Don’t you ever come near me or my son again.”
Hillingdon is really, really long
I think probably the longest you can walk in a straight line without leaving the same borough is to go from the Springwell Lake, in the northwest corner of Hillingdon, down to its southern tip beyond Heathrow.
That’s around 20km: walk that far from Trafalgar Square, and you can be out of Greater London altogether:
(It also works with Chigwell and Borehamwood, by the way.)
Anyway, that’s me done. You can buy the poster here.
And if I’ve forgotten to mock your borough, please do feel free to write in.
Update: Ed Povey from Place in Print – clearly a man who recognises an untapped market when he sees one – has been in touch. He’s offered a 20 per cent discount to anyone who buys this print, or others on his site, when they use the code “CITYMETRIC”.
So: there you go.
All diagrams courtesy of Place in Print, and maps courtesy of Google.This article is from the CityMetric archive: some formatting and images may not be present.